Setup cannot be performed on Read-only, mapped or compressed drives. FAT32 filesystems proved to be less secure then NTFS systems when using SQL Server 2016. Detailed information on disk space requirements for each feature could be found here.įAT32 filesystem is supported, but it is strongly recommended to avoid it, and use an NTFS formatted drives instead. Older 32 bit processors are not supported by the SQL Server 2016.Īt least 512 MB of system memory is required, but be aware that some of the features require much more.Īs for the hard drive – at least 6 GB of free space is required, and it heavily depends on additional features that could be installed. There are several hardware and software requirements that should be taken into consideration before installing new SQL Server 2016:Ħ4 bit processor, with at least 1.4 GHz clock speed. New features have been added, with their respective setup options SQL Server Management Studio has its own installation process, separated from installation of other services Although it is similar to the installation of SQL Server 2014 and other older versions, there are few notable differences: Along with these features, comes the new installation setup. Microsoft SQL Server 2016 provides faster transactions and queries, deeper insights on any device, advanced analytics, new security technology, and new hybrid cloud scenarios.
0 Comments
Did it eliminate the need to hand code HTML? Well, for some people, yes. So did the rise of the content management system change the web? Absolutely. You could easily make a functional website without even worrying about the underlying markup. Content management systems like Drupal and WordPress (and many, many others before them) displaced the need for the average content producer to need to edit raw HTML at all. These web authoring tools weren't just about WYSIWYG editing even for those who were comfortable with direct authoring of markup language, these tools offered advantages with template control, file management, and simply reducing the time it takes to create functional code.īut just as these helpful editors were expanding access to webpage creation, something else was happening too. Among the more successful was Macromedia (later Adobe) Dreamweaver, which was among my personal favorites for many years. Products like CoffeeCup, HotDog, FrontPage, GoLive, and many others filled the market, and many web-based WYSIWYG editors emerged as well. While some designers developed workflows completely based around manual editing of raw HTML files, the WYSIWYG (what you see is what you get) editor began to emerge as a tool of empowerment to millions of amateur and professional designers who didn't know, or at least hadn't mastered, the art of hypertext markup.
|